Resources Archives -

Can I Get My Copyright Back? A Brief Look at Section 203 of the U.S. Copyright Act

Disclaimer: The content of this article has been prepared for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The information on this website should not be construed as an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to create, nor shall the receipt of such information constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

You’ve written your first song, and now it’s time to share it with the world. It’s an exciting milestone! After negotiating a contract with a publisher, they’re ready to help get your music out there. You sign the contract, and it’s in their hands to do what they do best.

But what if you decide you no longer want to work with that publisher? Maybe your music is doing well, and you’re thinking about switching to self-publishing or a music administrator to increase your profits. Or perhaps you want to renegotiate your contract, or even work with a different publisher, to get better terms.

Whatever the reason, you want control of your copyright again to choose a new direction.

The issue is that you’ve given or trasnferred your copyright to the publisher – usually termed as granting rights or assigning rights in a contract. This is common practice, as it gives the publisher full, or exclusive, commercial control over your work, allowing them to maximize profit by licensing, distributing, and promoting your music across various platforms.

Can I get my copyright back?

The good news is, yes, you might be able to get your copyright back—and it’s explicitly built into copyright law. If we head over to Chapter 2 of the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976, you will find it addresses the issues of copyright ownership and transfer, but it also includes provisions for getting your copyright back – or, in the words of the Copyright Act, “the termination of licenses granted by the authors.”

NOTE: “Authors” will refer to the original creators and owners of the copyright, rather than using terms like composer or songwriter. “Termination” refers to the canceling of a grant of copyright to a publisher or another party.  

Who can terminate a grant of copyright?

When it comes to terminating a copyright grant or assignment, several factors come into play, including the author’s status, whether there were multiple authors involved, and the specific termination provisions in place.

For a living author, they have the right to terminate their own grant. If multiple authors agreed to the grant after January 1, 1978, a majority of those authors can terminate it. However, for grants made before that date, any author can terminate their own share.

If the author is deceased, the majority of the author’s heirs can terminate the grant. If there are no heirs, the author’s executor, administrator, or personal representative can step in to do so. In cases where the grant was made by the author’s heirs, the surviving heirs have the authority to terminate it.

Who cannot terminate?

Work-for-hire agreements are not eligible for termination, as these are considered works created as part of employment or as a contractor for another party, with the understanding that the copyright will be transferred to the employer or person paying for the work.

When can I get my copyright back? Section 203(a)(3)

We’ll be looking at a very specific section of Chapter 2 – specifically Section 203 of the Copyright Act.  Section 203 deals with the termination of grants, giving authors or their heirs the ability to reclaim their rights within a strict timeline.

Section 203(a)(3): “Termination of the grant may be effected at any time during a period of five years beginning at the end of thirty-five years from the date of execution 170 Copyright Law of the United States §203 Copyright Ownership and Transfer of the grant; or, if the grant covers the right of publication of the work, the period begins at the end of thirty-five years from the date of publication of the work under the grant or at the end of forty years from the date of execution of the grant, whichever term ends earlier.”

So, what does this mean? This means that authors or their heirs have the right to cancel (or “terminate”) a deal with a publisher after a certain amount of time. This can happen during a 5-year window, which starts 35 years after the original agreement was made (the date when the grant was signed).

If the grant covers the right to publish the work, the 5-year window for termination can also start 35 years after the work was first published, or 40 years after the grant was signed—whichever comes first.

So, after waiting for either 35 years from the agreement or 35 years from publication (whichever happens first), you or your heirs can begin the process of ending the deal and getting your rights back.

Let’s say you granted your copyright to a publisher in 2020. The earliest date you can terminate is 2035 and the latest is 2040.  

How do I terminate? – Section 203 (a)(4)

Now that you know when can you set or request a termination date, let’s go over how to terminate a grant of copyright.

Section 203(a)(4): “The termination shall be effected by serving an advance notice in writing, signed by the number and proportion of owners of termination interests required under clauses (1) and (2) of this subsection, or by their duly authorized agents, upon the grantee or the grantee’s successor in title.

To terminate the grant, a written notice must be served in advance, signed by the required number of owners with termination rights. The notice can also be signed by their authorized agents, such as an attorney or another party you authorize who is familiar with the process.

Essentially, all owners with a stake in the work need to send a signed notice, but they have the option to appoint an authorized agent to handle the task.

Let’s read on…

Section 203(a)(4)(A): The notice shall state the effective date of the termination, which shall fall within the five-year period specified by clause (3) of this subsection, and the notice shall be served not less than two or more than ten years before that date.

When the notice is sent, it needs to have the effective date of the termination.  Clause 3 (mentioned above) sets a specific 5-year period during which a copyright owner (or their successors) can serve a notice of termination, which is typically 35 to 40 years after the original grant of the copyright (depending on whether it was a work-for-hire or individual grant). The “effective date of termination” must fall within this 5-year period, meaning that the termination will happen at a date during that time frame. The notice of termination must be served not less than 2 or more than 10 years before the effective termination date.

So, essentially, the five-year period provides a specific window of time for the termination to become effective, and the notice must be sent out with the right timing within a range of 2 to 10 years before the termination is to take effect. This ensures that the termination is properly planned and filed within the law’s rules.

Let’s say your termination period spans from 2035 to 2040, and you’re aiming to terminate at the earliest possible date in 2035. In that case, the earliest you can send your notice is 2025 (10 years before), while the latest you can send it is 2033 (2 years before the desired termination date).

Now, let’s consider if you choose 2038 as your termination date. The earliest date you can send your notice would be 2028 (10 years before), and the latest date would be 2036 (2 years before the termination).

Sending a notice

In addition to sending a notice to the publisher, you also need to send a notice to the Copyright Office.

Section 203(a)(4)(A) continued: “A copy of the notice shall be recorded in the Copyright Office before the effective date of termination, as a condition to its taking effect.”

Section 203(a)(4)(B): “The notice shall comply, in form, content, and manner of service, with requirements that the Register of Copyrights shall prescribe by regulation.

When sending a copy of the notice to the Copyright Office, it will need to be accompanied by a Notice of Termination Cover Sheet.

There can be some limitations to terminating a copyright, but this will hopefully give you a better idea about the process.

Summary

Section 203 of the U.S. Copyright Act provides songwriters and authors with a valuable opportunity to regain control over their works after a period of time. After 35 years, or 40 years in some cases, you or your heirs may be able to terminate a contract with a publisher and reclaim your copyright. However, this process must be approached with careful timing and adherence to specific procedures, including serving written notice and recording it with the Copyright Office. While it may take decades before you can take advantage of this provision, it offers an important safeguard for creators who may want to renegotiate terms or explore different opportunities down the line.If this is something you’re considering, we recommend consulting with legal professionals for proper advice and guidance before terminating a copyright grant.

Steps to take:

  1. The Author, or majority of Authors, must decide or agree to terminate copyright.
  2. Figure out when set/request a terminate date between 35 and 40 years after the copyright grant.
  3. Write a notice to publisher requesting termination (signed by Authors).
  4. Submit notice to Copyright office with the accompanied Cover Sheet.

5 Songs Entering the Public Domain in 2025

As we move into 2025, a new wave of musical compositions, books, art, and films from 1929 enter the public domain. Here are five songs that became part of the public domain on January 1, 2025, which you can now arrange, quote, and incorporate into your own compositions.

1. An American in Paris
by George Gershwin

An American in Paris is a symphonic jazz composition by George Gershwin, first premiered in 1928, inspired by the composer’s visit to Paris and his impressions of the city. The piece blends classical music with jazz elements, capturing the vibrant atmosphere and cultural contrasts Gershwin experienced during his time in France.

2. Boléro
by Maurice Ravel

Boléro is a one-movement orchestral composition by Maurice Ravel, first premiered in 1928, known for its repetitive melody and gradually increasing orchestral intensity. The piece features a continuous, hypnotic rhythm and has become one of Ravel’s most famous works, often associated with themes of tension and relentless drive.

3. Singin’ in the Rain
by Arthur Freed and Nacio Herb Brown

“Singin’ in the Rain” is a classic song made famous from the 1952 musical film of the same name, performed by Gene Kelly, who famously danced and sang in a downpour. The song’s catchy tune and cheerful lyrics have made it a timeless anthem, often associated with the joy of carefree moments.

Note: The film Singin’ in the Rain is not in the public domain.

4. Ain’t Misbehavin’
by Andy Razaf, Thomas ‘Fats’ Waller, and Harry Brooks

“Ain’t Misbehavin'” is a jazz standard written by Fats Waller, Harry Brooks, and Andy Razaf in 1929, and became one of Waller’s most popular hits. The song’s playful lyrics and lively melody, along with Waller’s distinctive piano style, helped solidify its place as a beloved classic in the American jazz and blues repertoire.

5. Tiptoe Through the Tulips
by Alfred Dubin and Joseph Burke

“Tiptoe Through the Tulips” is a popular song written by Joe Burke and Al Dubin in 1929, famously performed by Tiny Tim in the 1960s. With its lighthearted melody and whimsical lyrics, the song has become an enduring novelty tune, known for its high-pitched vocals and playful, romantic imagery.Note: Tiny Tim’s rendition of the tune is not in the public domain.


To find more content from 1929, visit the Catalogue of Copyright Entires. This catalogue is published by the US Copyright office and is hosted by the University of Pennsylvania Libraries.

Interested in self-publishing and selling your sheet music or books? Learn more about Songburd Connect!

Basics of Public Domain & Creative Commons

When publishing, you will encounter different types of licenses that govern the use of content. Creative Commons licenses and public domain are two common examples of such licenses. In this article, we’ll explore the different types of Creative Commons licenses and what they allow, as well as what it means for licensing additional content to use with your work (i.e. cover images, graphics, etc.) and other content to be in the public domain.

Creative Commons Licenses

Creative Commons (CC) is a non-profit organization that provides a set of licenses that creators can use to grant permission to others to use their content. These licenses are designed to make it easier for creators to share their work while still retaining some control over how it’s used. There are six different types of Creative Commons licenses, each with its own set of conditions:

  1. CC BY (Attribution): This license allows others to use, distribute, and modify the work, as long as they give credit to the original creator.
  2. CC BY-SA (Attribution-ShareAlike): This license allows others to use, distribute, and modify the work, as long as they give credit to the original creator and release any derivative works under the same license.
  3. CC BY-ND (Attribution-NoDerivs): This license allows others to use and distribute the work, as long as they give credit to the original creator and do not make any changes to it.
  4. CC BY-NC (Attribution-NonCommercial): This license allows others to use, distribute, and modify the work for non-commercial purposes, as long as they give credit to the original creator.
  5. CC BY-NC-SA (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike): This license allows others to use, distribute, and modify the work for non-commercial purposes, as long as they give credit to the original creator and release any derivative works under the same license.
  6. CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs): This license allows others to use and distribute the work for non-commercial purposes, as long as they give credit to the original creator and do not make any changes to it.

Each of these licenses is represented by a symbol that can be added to the content to indicate which license applies.

The chart below shows the different licenses and what rights apply to each one.

CC LICENSESCopy & PublishAttribution RequiredCommercial UseModify & AdaptChange License
CC BYYesYesYesYesYes
BY-SAYesYesYesYesNo
BY-NDYesYesYesNoYes
BY-NCYesYesNoYesYes
BY-NC-SAYesYesNoYesNo
BY-NC-NDYesYesNoNoYes
Public DomainYesNoYesYesYes

Public Domain

Content that is in the public domain is not protected by copyright, meaning it can be used freely by anyone without permission. This includes works whose copyright has expired, works that were never protected by copyright, and works that have been released into the public domain by their creators. In general, works enter the public domain when their copyright expires, which typically occurs a certain number of years after the creator’s death.

There are a few important things to keep in mind when using content that is in the public domain. While you don’t need to obtain permission to use the content, you should still be aware of any applicable laws or regulations. Additionally, some public domain works may have been updated or revised, so it’s important to ensure that you’re using the most up-to-date version of the work. To view a list of countries and their rules for public domain, read our article about Public Domain Rules in Different Countries. If you are interested in arranging music by another composer, it is always good to check to see if it is in public domain in all countries before publishing.

Creative Commons licenses and public domain are two important concepts that can help creators and users of content to navigate the complex landscape of intellectual property law. By understanding the different types of Creative Commons licenses and what they allow, as well as what it means for content to be in the public domain, we can make informed decisions about how to share and use creative works. Whether you’re a creator looking to share your work, or a user looking to use someone else’s work, it’s important to consider the applicable licenses and regulations before doing so.