Songburd Music, Author at

5 Songs Entering the Public Domain in 2026

It’s a new year!  That means a whole new list of musical compositions, books, art, and films enter the public domain. Here are five songs that became part of the public domain on January 1, 2026, which you can now arrange, quote, and incorporate into your own compositions.

1. I Got Rhythm
by George & Ira Gershwin

“I Got Rhythm,” composed by George Gershwin with lyrics by Ira Gershwin for the 1930 musical Girl Crazy, is a cornerstone of the American songbook. Its 32-bar AABA form and harmonic framework—later called “rhythm changes”—became one of the most pervasive structural templates in jazz composition and improvisation.

2. Dream a Little Dream of Me
by Gus Kahn, Fabian Andre and Wilbur Schwandt

“Dream a Little Dream of Me,” with lyrics by Gus Kahn and music by Fabian André and Wilbur Schwandt, is a 1931 popular song that blends gentle romantic imagery with a lilting, lullaby-like melody. The song’s simple, diatonic harmony and slow, intimate tempo have made it especially adaptable to close vocal harmonies and expressive rubato. Its enduring appeal is reflected in its many reinterpretations across jazz, pop, and folk traditions, from Ozzie Nelson’s early recordings to later iconic versions by Ella Fitzgerald and the Mamas & the Papas.

3. Body and Soul
by Edward Heyman, Robert Sour, Frank Eyton, and Johnny Green

“Body and Soul,” composed by Johnny Green with lyrics by Edward Heyman, Robert Sour, and Frank Eyton, is a 1930 ballad renowned for its harmonically rich, chromatic progression. The song became a landmark of jazz interpretation through Coleman Hawkins’s 1939 recording, which largely abandons the melody in favor of extended harmonic improvisation. Since then, it has stood as a touchstone for ballad playing, prized for its demanding voice leading and expressive potential.

4. Georgia on My Mind
by Stuart Gorrell and Hoagy Carmichael

“Georgia on My Mind,” composed by Hoagy Carmichael with lyrics by Stuart Gorrell, is a 1930 popular song noted for its supple melody and subtly shifting harmonies. Its AABA form and expressive use of secondary dominants and modulations have made it a favorite vehicle for personalized phrasing and reharmonization in jazz and popular performance. The song’s legacy was cemented through iconic interpretations—most famously Ray Charles’s—while remaining a staple of the Great American Songbook.

5. The Royal Welch Fusiliers
by John Philip Sousa

“The Royal Welch Fusiliers” is a military march composed by John Philip Sousa in 1923 in honor of the British Army regiment of the same name. Stylistically, it blends Sousa’s characteristic American march idiom—clear strains, buoyant rhythms, and a lyrical trio—with a ceremonial dignity befitting its British subject. The piece reflects Sousa’s international reputation and his frequent engagement with military traditions beyond the United States.

5 Resources for Music Editing and Engraving

When you look at a piece of sheet music, it’s often easy to tell whether it looks professionally published or homemade. But what exactly makes music notation look polished and publish-ready? What formatting rules, engraving standards, and visual details elevate a score to the level of the big publishing houses?

Composers and editors rely on a variety of trusted resources when preparing their music for publication. Below are a few essential tools that never leave our desk:

1. Behind Bars by Elaine Gould

No list of music engraving resources is complete without Behind Bars. Written by Elaine Gould, this book is widely considered the industry standard for music notation and engraving. Its comprehensive guidelines cover everything from basic rhythms to complex orchestral scores.

Purchase here

2. Writing About Music: A Style Sheet by D. Kern Holoman

While Behind Bars covers the visual and technical aspects of notation, Holoman’s Writing About Music focuses on the textual side. This concise style guide is indispensable for composers, editors, and musicians when crafting program notes, titles, and other written materials related to music.

Purchase here

3. Berklee Contemporary Music Notation by Jonathan Feist

Produced by Berklee College of Music, this guide is tailored for modern music notation. While not as exhaustive as Gould’s work, it’s especially useful for composers working in jazz, pop, or contemporary classical styles. Clear, accessible, and practical—a must-have for any modern composer.

Purchase here

4. The Study of Orchestration by Samuel Adler

Primarily a textbook used in orchestration courses, Adler’s book is also a helpful reference for engraving. It provides insight into instrument ranges, transpositions, and common orchestration practices—key considerations when formatting professional-looking scores.

Purchase here  

5. MOLA Guidelines for Music Preparation

What’s best for the performer? That’s the question behind the Music Preparation Guidelines published by the Major Orchestra Librarians’ Association (MOLA). This free resource outlines best practices for formatting performance parts and scores, especially for orchestras, bands, and other large ensembles.

Get the free PDF here.

These resources provide a strong foundation for any composer or music editor striving to create professional-quality scores. Many more tools and reference materials are available to support the editing and engraving process, and we’ll explore additional, more specialized resources in a future article.

Need help editing your sheet music?
Our award-winning engravers are here to support you. We offer professional engraving and editorial services for all types of sheet music. Let us bring your music to life—reach out at contact@songburdmusic.com.

Style Guide Tips for Writing About Music

If you’ve ever written a paper in school, you probably remember being hit with a long list of grammar and formatting rules. And if you’re anything like me, you’ve probably had troubles remembering them all—Is the title italicized or in quotes? Is this the right spelling? Where does the comma go?

It can definitely get confusing—especially once you realize that there isn’t just one set of rules. While grammar has its foundations, style guides like APA, MLA, or AP each have their own rules for how to write, spell, and format material (some even get rid of Oxford comma).

Think of them as playbooks. They help keep writing clear, consistent, and tailored to a specific audience or purpose. In this article, we’ll explore a handful of writing and formatting tips specifically for writing about music—like what to italicize, how to reference titles, and how to address common issues. The goal? To help you start building your own go-to style guide for program notes, blogs, or academic writing about music.

Quick note before we dive in:

  • Throughout this post, we’ll refer to text formatting like Roman, Italics, and Bold. Roman simply means regular text—no bold or italics.
  • Serif fonts have small strokes or “feet” on the ends of letters (like Times New Roman), giving them a traditional look.
  • Sans-serif fonts (like Arial or Helvetica) skip those strokes, giving them a cleaner, more modern appearance.

Lastly, this post focuses on formatting written content about music—such as concert programs or essays—not on how content appears inside a music score.  Although some of these concepts may still apply in a score.

TITLES

When writing about a piece, the font conventions you use (Roman vs. Italics) depend on how the work is titled. Titles of standard classical pieces usually include the number, key, catalog number, and, if available, an assigned title.

Generic Titles

Generic titles use familiar form names—Symphony, Concerto, Sonata, etc. These titles include the genre, number, key, catalog number, and sometimes a nickname. These are not italicized or placed in quotation marks.

  • Symphony No. 1 in C Major, Op. 68 – Johannes Brahms
  • Nocturne in E-flat Major, Op. 9 No. 2 – Frédéric Chopin
  • Symphony No. 4 in E Minor, Op. 98 – Johannes Brahms

Titles Given by Composer

When a composer assigns a unique title to a piece (rather than a generic label), the title is usually italicized.

  • Clair de Lune – Claude Debussy
  • Honk! – Mica Redden
  • The Rite of Spring – Igor Stravinsky
  • Eine kleine Nachtmusik – Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart

Common Names

Some works with generic titles have acquired common names. When used with a generic title, the nickname appears in quotation marks and parentheses.

  • Piano Sonata No. 11 in A Major, K. 331 (“Turkish March”) – Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
  • Symphony No. 3 in E-flat Major, Op. 55 (“Eroica”) – Ludwig van Beethoven
  • Symphony No. 2 in C Minor (“Resurrection”)

When a generic title (e.g., Symphony No. 2 in C Minor) is used, a nickname or common name like “Resurrection” should appear in quotation marks and parentheses. If the nickname is used alone, it can be treated as a given title and set in italics (depending on style guide), but many writers may capitalize it without italics.

The performance of Symphony No. 2 in C Minor ("Resurrection") will be given by the Nashville Symphony on November 2.

or with italics

The performance of Mahler’s Resurrection Symphony will be given by the Nashville Symphony on November 2.

or no italics

The performance of Mahler’s Resurrection Symphony will be given by the Nashville Symphony on November 2.

Operas, Musicals and Arias

Titles of operas and musicals are italicized. Arias, scenes, or individual numbers are placed in quotation marks.

  • “L’amour est un oiseau rebelle” from Carmen
  • “Some Enchanted Evening” from South Pacific

Song Titles and Albums

Similarly, in modern and popular music, song titles are placed in quotation marks, while album titles are set in italics.

  • “Come together” from the album Abbey Road by The Beatles
  • “All Too Well” from the album Red by Taylor Swift

Other Languages

A few things to be aware of in other languages:

Spanish: Spanish capitalizes the first word of proper nouns, but lowercases the additional words included in the noun or title.

La casa de al lado

and not

La Casa De Al Lado

Chinese: Chinese is read from left to right. There are two common writing systems: Simplified Chinese and Traditional Chinese. Simplified Chinese is commonly used in Mainland China, Singapore, and Malaysia, while Traditional Chinese characters are used in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macau.

Hebrew and Arabic: Copy in these languages run right to left.  You should consider this when including text or title translations.

FLATS AND SHARPS (AND OTHER ACCIDENTALS)

One common issue that comes up when writing about music is how to refer to flats and sharps. Many people use a lowercase “b” for flat or a number sign “#” for sharp—but these are incorrect in professional writing and can lead to confusion.

In most cases, the best approach is to write out the words “flat” or “sharp” to avoid formatting issues. For example:

  • A-flat Major
  • C-sharp Minor

If you have music notation software like Finale, Sibelius, or Dorico, you may have access to music fonts that include proper flat and sharp symbols. However, be cautious—these fonts don’t always display correctly across all platforms or documents, so it’s safest to stick with the written terms in most contexts.

DYNAMICS

Dynamics are written in italics.

The first movement began at pianissimo, but built to a strong forte.

You may also reference dynamics using abbreviated markings, which are typically shown in bold italics using a serif font.

The first movement begin at pp, but built to a strong f.

If you choose to use abbreviations, it may be helpful to spell out the term with the abbreviation in parentheses at the first mention. After that, you can use just the abbreviation. If the dynamic appears only once, simply spelling out the word is clearer and avoids unnecessary confusion.

The first movement began at pianissimo (pp) and built to a strong forte (f). In my view, starting at pp was an unwise dynamic choice, as it created significant challenges for the winds.

TIME SIGNATURES

When writing about time signatures, especially in program notes or descriptive passages, clarity and consistency are key. While there’s no universally mandated style guide, a few standard approaches have emerged—and the best choice often depends on your audience.

Numerical Format

This is the most common and straightforward way to write time signatures, especially for a musically literate audience.

This piece is in 3/4 time, with the feel of a brisk waltz.

Spelled-Out Format

This approach appears more often in literary or narrative writing. It can soften the technical tone of your text.

This piece is in three-four time, with the feel of a brisk waltz.

Descriptive Format

Using meter terms (like “duple,” “triple,” or “compound”) is helpful when emphasizing feel or flow rather than notation.

This piece is in triple meter, with the feel of a brisk waltz.

Your choice depends on your audience. If you’re writing for musicians or those familiar with music theory, the numerical format is likely the clearest and most concise. However, if your readers may not have a musical background, the descriptive or spelled-out formats can make your writing more accessible.

COMPOSER NAMES

Use full name on first mention, and last name on subsequent mentions.

Dr. Rose Densen is an American singer, composer, and educator. Densen's career began with the premiere of her work, Bird Calls, with the Sarasota Symphony in 2014.

You do not need to mention the a persons professional title (Dr.) on the subsequent mention unless you feel the situation requires it to honor who you are writing about. It goes without saying, but always double check spelling and preferred names.

AVOID “JARGON”

Not all readers will be familiar with terms like “parallel fifths” or “modulation to the mediant.” When you do need to use technical language, make sure to briefly explain it in plain terms or provide context for why it matters. A quick explanation helps keep your writing accessible without watering it down—and it invites less experienced readers into the conversation rather than shutting them out.

What counts as “jargon” is often subjective and depends largely on your audience. A term that’s everyday language to one reader might be confusing to another. When in doubt, aim for clarity—even when writing for experts. Clear, simple language doesn’t dumb down your ideas; it makes them more powerful and accessible.

More technical version:

The piece features a modulation to the relative major, a shift that brings a subtle but noticeable lift in character.

More approachable version:

Partway through, the piece changes key, moving to a closely related major tonality that brightens the mood without feeling abrupt.

Rhythm Charts: Music Notation That Adapts to Your Needs

If you are a jazz or modern musician, you’ve probably heard of rhythm charts – and chances are, you’ve used them. But what exactly are they?

Rhythm charts are designed to highlight the essentials of a piece of music – they’re concise and go straight to the point.​ Often used in jazz and modern music —but useful for any genre — rhythm charts are musical roadmaps. However, since they’re highly customizable, it’s essential to choose the one that best fits you and your ensemble’s needs.

Let’s dive in!

Chord Charts

Using chord charts is like following a musical GPS. They guide you smoothly through the essential elements of a piece and are ideal for improvising, introducing variations, accompanying, or adding your own unique touch to the music!

Chord charts only show the structure and harmonic content of the song using chord symbols, fretboard diagrams, Roman numerals, or the Nashville Numbers System. They are a perfect fit for genres like pop, rock, jazz, and folk.

There are two standard chord charts:

  • Chord and slash charts place chord symbols directly over their corresponding beats within the song structure, breaking each measure down into individual beats. They also include details on tempo, dynamics, style, time, key, and structure.
  • Chord and strumming charts go a step further by including the strumming pattern throughout the song. They’re especially useful for fretboard instruments, as they can also show strumming direction.
Slash Notation. Image provided by My Sheet Music Transcriptions

Rhythm Charts

Rhythm charts combine rhythmic notation, standard notation, chord symbols, and text to
provide all the necessary information for the rhythm section (i.e., piano, guitar, bass, and
drums). In essence, they summarize the essential content of a song in a single part. Rhythm
charts are versatile, making them useful for various ensembles and genres, including large
gospel choirs, small jazz combos, and rock bands.

There are three types of rhythm charts: master rhythm charts, detailed rhythm charts, and instrument rhythm charts.

  1. Master rhythm charts act as musical maps, condensing all the necessary information, so the entire rhythm section can use the same chart. A master rhythm chart will generally include the time signature, key signature, tempo, style, structure, chord symbols, and kicks.
  2. Detailed rhythm charts elevate master rhythm charts by providing note-for-note transcriptions of each instrument’s most important “riffs,” melodies, and patterns. This allows every member of the band to use the same sheet, with a more comprehensive breakdown of the music.
  3. Instrument rhythm charts focus on a specific instrument and use a mix of rhythm, standard, and slash notation. This versatility makes them the modern music industry standard for session work, jazz combos and other ensembles.
Master Rhythm Chart. Image provided by My Sheet Music Transcriptions.

Rhythm charts are essential tools for jazz and modern musicians, providing a concise and effective way to focus on the key elements of a piece. They serve as customizable musical roadmaps that guide musicians through various aspects of a song. There are different types of rhythm charts, including chord charts, master rhythm charts, detailed rhythm charts, and instrument rhythm charts, each offering varying levels of detail. Chord charts help with structure and harmony, while rhythm charts combine rhythmic notation, chord symbols, and text for a comprehensive overview of the song. Detailed charts go a step further by offering note-for-note transcriptions, and instrument-specific charts focus on individual parts. Regardless of the genre or ensemble, rhythm charts are invaluable for navigating complex music and enhancing performance.


This article by Marina Junquera and My Sheet Music Transcriptions

In need of a chart? Check out My Sheet Music Transcriptions for a wide range of options and services tailored to your needs! Discover everything there is to know about our rhythm charts and get your customized price quote via email. Let the music charts be your guiding star!

Is Offering Digital Downloads of Your Sheet Music the Right Choice?

In today’s digital age of downloading and streaming, and with services like Amazon Prime offering next-day delivery, there’s a strong incentive for businesses to deliver products as quickly as possible. Offering digital downloads of your sheet music can certainly meet this demand. But is it always the best option? Let’s explore the pros and cons of offering digital sheet music downloads.

Pros

1. Instant Access

One of the most obvious advantages of digital sheet music is the ability to provide instant access. Once a customer makes a purchase, they can immediately download the music. This is especially useful for ensemble librarians or directors who may need a perusal score quickly. In such cases, offering a watermarked or redacted PDF for speedy distribution can be a great solution.

2. Wider Reach

Digital sheet music has the potential to reach a global audience. We’ve noticed higher digital sales through our retail channels when selling internationally. Additionally, depending on the type of music you offer, international customers may prefer the convenience of a digital download over waiting for a physical copy to arrive or paying for shipping costs.

3. Lower Production Cost

Without the need for printing scores and parts, you can significantly reduce production costs, allowing you to keep more of the profit from each sale. While we generally recommend keeping the retail price the same for both print and digital versions (for reasons we’ll cover later), this approach also gives you the flexibility to offer a digital version at a lower price, if desired. 

4. Interactive Features

When offering digital versions of your music, you may be able to incorporate interactive elements that enhance the customer experience. This is particularly appealing if you’re producing a method book where you can include audio or video examples. For theory workbooks, you could integrate interactive multiple-choice questions or quizzes to engage your audience further.

Cons

1. Piracy and Copyright

One of the biggest concerns with digital products is the risk of copyright infringement. Selling a digital edition makes it easier for someone to redistribute your sheet music without permission. However, there are platforms that can help curb this issue. For instance, Newzik is a digital platform that offers features to prevent downloads, adding an extra layer of security. Songburd exclusively distributes digital editions through Newzik to help protect against copyright infringement. Other distribution channels, like nkoda and JW Pepper, also offer various protection measures through their own systems. If you decide to offer digital editions, it’s important to work with a distributor that collaborates with trusted retailers and platforms.

2. Formatting

While most sheet music formats translate well to digital, there can be issues with large ensemble scores, which may include as many as 20-35 systems (even after condensing). These scores are often produced on Tabloid-sized (11 x 17 in) paper or even oversized 12 x 18 in sheets. When attempting to read these scores on a tablet or printing them on common 8.5 x 11 in paper, the systems can become difficult to read, which may compromise the clarity of the music.

3. Less Control Distribution

Different platforms have their own rules and terms regarding pricing, discounts, and distribution. If you choose to sell digital editions through third-party retailers, you may need to conform to their policies, which may or may not align with your goals. Additionally, by offering only digital versions, you miss out on opportunities that print editions can provide—such as reaching more retail outlets and expanding your distribution. Many performers still prefer printed music, and schools, ensembles, and professional groups often favor ordering sheet music in a professionally printed format.

4. Technology Reliance

Although digital downloads are widely used, not everyone has the ability to download or print digital sheet music. There is also a certain level of dependence on digital platforms and devices. As technology evolves, devices require updates to support new formats, which can create long-term accessibility and usability issues. Publishers continuously monitor and adapt to these changes, but when self-publishing, it’s important to be aware of the same challenges and plan accordingly.

Recommendations

Offering digital downloads of sheet music provides instant access, a wider reach to international customers, lower production costs, and the potential for interactive features. However, there are some downsides. Piracy and copyright infringement are concerns, though some platforms may offer protections. Formatting challenges can occur with large scores, making them difficult to read on smaller devices or paper. Additionally, selling digitally means less control over distribution and missing out on opportunities in physical retail outlets. Lastly, not everyone has the technology to download or print digital music, and evolving formats can create long-term accessibility issues.To address these challenges, consider offering your music for both digital downloads and print-on-demand. This allows you to provide customers with instant access while also catering to those who prefer physical copies, ensuring broader accessibility and flexibility.

Can I Get My Copyright Back? A Brief Look at Section 203 of the U.S. Copyright Act

Disclaimer: The content of this article has been prepared for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The information on this website should not be construed as an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to create, nor shall the receipt of such information constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

You’ve written your first song, and now it’s time to share it with the world. It’s an exciting milestone! After negotiating a contract with a publisher, they’re ready to help get your music out there. You sign the contract, and it’s in their hands to do what they do best.

But what if you decide you no longer want to work with that publisher? Maybe your music is doing well, and you’re thinking about switching to self-publishing or a music administrator to increase your profits. Or perhaps you want to renegotiate your contract, or even work with a different publisher, to get better terms.

Whatever the reason, you want control of your copyright again to choose a new direction.

The issue is that you’ve given or trasnferred your copyright to the publisher – usually termed as granting rights or assigning rights in a contract. This is common practice, as it gives the publisher full, or exclusive, commercial control over your work, allowing them to maximize profit by licensing, distributing, and promoting your music across various platforms.

Can I get my copyright back?

The good news is, yes, you might be able to get your copyright back—and it’s explicitly built into copyright law. If we head over to Chapter 2 of the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976, you will find it addresses the issues of copyright ownership and transfer, but it also includes provisions for getting your copyright back – or, in the words of the Copyright Act, “the termination of licenses granted by the authors.”

NOTE: “Authors” will refer to the original creators and owners of the copyright, rather than using terms like composer or songwriter. “Termination” refers to the canceling of a grant of copyright to a publisher or another party.  

Who can terminate a grant of copyright?

When it comes to terminating a copyright grant or assignment, several factors come into play, including the author’s status, whether there were multiple authors involved, and the specific termination provisions in place.

For a living author, they have the right to terminate their own grant. If multiple authors agreed to the grant after January 1, 1978, a majority of those authors can terminate it. However, for grants made before that date, any author can terminate their own share.

If the author is deceased, the majority of the author’s heirs can terminate the grant. If there are no heirs, the author’s executor, administrator, or personal representative can step in to do so. In cases where the grant was made by the author’s heirs, the surviving heirs have the authority to terminate it.

Who cannot terminate?

Work-for-hire agreements are not eligible for termination, as these are considered works created as part of employment or as a contractor for another party, with the understanding that the copyright will be transferred to the employer or person paying for the work.

When can I get my copyright back? Section 203(a)(3)

We’ll be looking at a very specific section of Chapter 2 – specifically Section 203 of the Copyright Act.  Section 203 deals with the termination of grants, giving authors or their heirs the ability to reclaim their rights within a strict timeline.

Section 203(a)(3): “Termination of the grant may be effected at any time during a period of five years beginning at the end of thirty-five years from the date of execution 170 Copyright Law of the United States §203 Copyright Ownership and Transfer of the grant; or, if the grant covers the right of publication of the work, the period begins at the end of thirty-five years from the date of publication of the work under the grant or at the end of forty years from the date of execution of the grant, whichever term ends earlier.”

So, what does this mean? This means that authors or their heirs have the right to cancel (or “terminate”) a deal with a publisher after a certain amount of time. This can happen during a 5-year window, which starts 35 years after the original agreement was made (the date when the grant was signed).

If the grant covers the right to publish the work, the 5-year window for termination can also start 35 years after the work was first published, or 40 years after the grant was signed—whichever comes first.

So, after waiting for either 35 years from the agreement or 35 years from publication (whichever happens first), you or your heirs can begin the process of ending the deal and getting your rights back.

Let’s say you granted your copyright to a publisher in 2020. The earliest date you can terminate is 2035 and the latest is 2040.  

How do I terminate? – Section 203 (a)(4)

Now that you know when can you set or request a termination date, let’s go over how to terminate a grant of copyright.

Section 203(a)(4): “The termination shall be effected by serving an advance notice in writing, signed by the number and proportion of owners of termination interests required under clauses (1) and (2) of this subsection, or by their duly authorized agents, upon the grantee or the grantee’s successor in title.

To terminate the grant, a written notice must be served in advance, signed by the required number of owners with termination rights. The notice can also be signed by their authorized agents, such as an attorney or another party you authorize who is familiar with the process.

Essentially, all owners with a stake in the work need to send a signed notice, but they have the option to appoint an authorized agent to handle the task.

Let’s read on…

Section 203(a)(4)(A): The notice shall state the effective date of the termination, which shall fall within the five-year period specified by clause (3) of this subsection, and the notice shall be served not less than two or more than ten years before that date.

When the notice is sent, it needs to have the effective date of the termination.  Clause 3 (mentioned above) sets a specific 5-year period during which a copyright owner (or their successors) can serve a notice of termination, which is typically 35 to 40 years after the original grant of the copyright (depending on whether it was a work-for-hire or individual grant). The “effective date of termination” must fall within this 5-year period, meaning that the termination will happen at a date during that time frame. The notice of termination must be served not less than 2 or more than 10 years before the effective termination date.

So, essentially, the five-year period provides a specific window of time for the termination to become effective, and the notice must be sent out with the right timing within a range of 2 to 10 years before the termination is to take effect. This ensures that the termination is properly planned and filed within the law’s rules.

Let’s say your termination period spans from 2035 to 2040, and you’re aiming to terminate at the earliest possible date in 2035. In that case, the earliest you can send your notice is 2025 (10 years before), while the latest you can send it is 2033 (2 years before the desired termination date).

Now, let’s consider if you choose 2038 as your termination date. The earliest date you can send your notice would be 2028 (10 years before), and the latest date would be 2036 (2 years before the termination).

Sending a notice

In addition to sending a notice to the publisher, you also need to send a notice to the Copyright Office.

Section 203(a)(4)(A) continued: “A copy of the notice shall be recorded in the Copyright Office before the effective date of termination, as a condition to its taking effect.”

Section 203(a)(4)(B): “The notice shall comply, in form, content, and manner of service, with requirements that the Register of Copyrights shall prescribe by regulation.

When sending a copy of the notice to the Copyright Office, it will need to be accompanied by a Notice of Termination Cover Sheet.

There can be some limitations to terminating a copyright, but this will hopefully give you a better idea about the process.

Summary

Section 203 of the U.S. Copyright Act provides songwriters and authors with a valuable opportunity to regain control over their works after a period of time. After 35 years, or 40 years in some cases, you or your heirs may be able to terminate a contract with a publisher and reclaim your copyright. However, this process must be approached with careful timing and adherence to specific procedures, including serving written notice and recording it with the Copyright Office. While it may take decades before you can take advantage of this provision, it offers an important safeguard for creators who may want to renegotiate terms or explore different opportunities down the line.If this is something you’re considering, we recommend consulting with legal professionals for proper advice and guidance before terminating a copyright grant.

Steps to take:

  1. The Author, or majority of Authors, must decide or agree to terminate copyright.
  2. Figure out when set/request a terminate date between 35 and 40 years after the copyright grant.
  3. Write a notice to publisher requesting termination (signed by Authors).
  4. Submit notice to Copyright office with the accompanied Cover Sheet.

5 Songs Entering the Public Domain in 2025

As we move into 2025, a new wave of musical compositions, books, art, and films from 1929 enter the public domain. Here are five songs that became part of the public domain on January 1, 2025, which you can now arrange, quote, and incorporate into your own compositions.

1. An American in Paris
by George Gershwin

An American in Paris is a symphonic jazz composition by George Gershwin, first premiered in 1928, inspired by the composer’s visit to Paris and his impressions of the city. The piece blends classical music with jazz elements, capturing the vibrant atmosphere and cultural contrasts Gershwin experienced during his time in France.

2. Boléro
by Maurice Ravel

Boléro is a one-movement orchestral composition by Maurice Ravel, first premiered in 1928, known for its repetitive melody and gradually increasing orchestral intensity. The piece features a continuous, hypnotic rhythm and has become one of Ravel’s most famous works, often associated with themes of tension and relentless drive.

3. Singin’ in the Rain
by Arthur Freed and Nacio Herb Brown

“Singin’ in the Rain” is a classic song made famous from the 1952 musical film of the same name, performed by Gene Kelly, who famously danced and sang in a downpour. The song’s catchy tune and cheerful lyrics have made it a timeless anthem, often associated with the joy of carefree moments.

Note: The film Singin’ in the Rain is not in the public domain.

4. Ain’t Misbehavin’
by Andy Razaf, Thomas ‘Fats’ Waller, and Harry Brooks

“Ain’t Misbehavin'” is a jazz standard written by Fats Waller, Harry Brooks, and Andy Razaf in 1929, and became one of Waller’s most popular hits. The song’s playful lyrics and lively melody, along with Waller’s distinctive piano style, helped solidify its place as a beloved classic in the American jazz and blues repertoire.

5. Tiptoe Through the Tulips
by Alfred Dubin and Joseph Burke

“Tiptoe Through the Tulips” is a popular song written by Joe Burke and Al Dubin in 1929, famously performed by Tiny Tim in the 1960s. With its lighthearted melody and whimsical lyrics, the song has become an enduring novelty tune, known for its high-pitched vocals and playful, romantic imagery.Note: Tiny Tim’s rendition of the tune is not in the public domain.


To find more content from 1929, visit the Catalogue of Copyright Entires. This catalogue is published by the US Copyright office and is hosted by the University of Pennsylvania Libraries.

Interested in self-publishing and selling your sheet music or books? Learn more about Songburd Connect!

Frequently Asked Questions about Performing Rights Organizations

What is a Performing Rights Organization (PRO) and what do they do?

A Performing Rights Organization (PRO) is an entity that represents songwriters, composers, and music publishers in managing and licensing their performance rights. The primary role of a PRO is to ensure that creators receive compensation when their music is performed in public. Here are the key functions of a Performing Rights Organization:

  1. Licensing and Royalty Collection: PROs negotiate licenses with businesses and organizations that use music publicly, such as radio stations, television networks, concert venues, restaurants, and streaming services. These licenses grant permission to use the copyrighted music, and in return, the businesses pay licensing fees. The PROs collect these fees on behalf of their members.
  2. Royalty Distribution: After collecting licensing fees, PROs distribute royalties to their member songwriters, composers, and music publishers. The distribution is based on various factors, including the frequency and popularity of the performances, as well as the terms of the licensing agreements.
  3. Monitoring and Tracking Performances: PROs use advanced technology and monitoring systems to track when and where music is performed in public. This includes monitoring radio and TV broadcasts, live performances, online streaming, and other public uses of music.
  4. Advocacy and Education: PROs often engage in advocacy efforts to protect the rights of their members and to promote fair compensation for the use of their music. They may also provide educational resources to help members understand their rights and navigate the music industry.
  5. International Collaboration: Many PROs operate internationally and collaborate with each other through reciprocal agreements. This ensures that members receive royalties for performances of their music in foreign countries, and vice versa.

What is a “writer?”

A “writer” refers to an individual who creates the musical composition, which includes the musical notes, lyrics, or both. The term is commonly used to describe songwriters and composers. Here’s a breakdown of the roles:

  1. Songwriters: These are individuals who write the lyrics or words of a song. They focus on crafting the textual content that accompanies the music. Songwriters may work independently or collaborate with others, including composers.
  2. Composers: Composers are individuals who create the musical elements of a song, including the melody, harmony, and overall musical structure. Composers may work independently or collaborate with songwriters to create a complete musical composition.

PROs consider “Writer” to receive 50% (or half) of the performing royalties, while the publisher receives the other 50% (or half). Some organizations calculate this number differently. For example, BMI considers the Writer half at 100% and the Publisher portion as 100%. Regardless, there are two equal royalty remissions to these two entities.

What is a “publisher?”

A “publisher” refers to an entity or individual responsible for managing and administering the business aspects of a musical composition. The publisher works in collaboration with the songwriters and composers to promote, license, and collect royalties for their works. Here are key aspects of the role of a publisher in a PRO:

  1. Administration of Rights: Publishers handle the administrative aspects of a musical composition’s rights. This includes registering the work with the PRO, managing contracts, and ensuring that all necessary paperwork is in order for the licensing and collection of royalties.
  2. Licensing: Publishers negotiate and issue licenses for the use of musical compositions. This can include licensing for performances in various settings such as concerts, radio, television, online streaming, and more. The goal is to ensure that the composition is properly licensed, and the appropriate fees are paid for its use.
  3. Royalty Collection: Publishers work with PROs to collect royalties generated from the public performance of musical compositions. This involves tracking performances, collecting licensing fees from businesses and organizations that use the music, and distributing the earned royalties to the songwriters and composers.
  4. Promotion and Marketing: Publishers often play a role in promoting the works of their affiliated songwriters and composers. This may involve marketing efforts to increase the visibility of the music and secure opportunities for its use in various media and commercial outlets.
  5. Global Representation: Publishers may work internationally, collaborating with PROs in different countries through reciprocal agreements. This ensures that the musical compositions are properly represented and generate royalties when performed globally.
  6. Advocacy and Business Development: Publishers may advocate for the rights of their affiliated writers and composers, engaging in negotiations and business development activities to secure favorable terms for the use of their works.

It’s worth noting that some songwriters and composers choose to handle the administrative and business aspects of their music themselves, while others opt to work with music publishers. In either case, the collaboration between writers and publishers is crucial for effectively managing the business side of the music industry and ensuring that creators are compensated for the use of their works.

What is an IPI number?

An IPI number (Interested Party Information) is a number assigned to writers and publishers when they join a performing rights organization. This unique number is usually between 9 and 12 digits long and identifies you as the copyright holder of the song. Administrators and publishers may request this number in regards to licensing or collecting royalties.

Should I register as just a writer, or should I register as both a writer & publisher?

If you have an administrator or publisher collecting the publisher portion of royalties on your behalf, then you may not need to register for both. If you plan on self-publishing and want to represent yourself on business matters, we recommend signing up as both a writer and publisher. Even if you don’t plan on collecting publisher royalties now, it is a good idea to go ahead and set that up in case you want to collect those payouts later on.

Composers who distribute their music through Songburd Connect for self-publishing should register as both writer and publisher to ensure they are receiving full compensation for their work.

How much does it cost to join?

The cost to join a PRO will range from FREE to a few hundred dollars (USD). Some organizations may offer more benefits such as better royalty rates. You should review the benefits of each organization and decide if the cost to sign up is worth the investment.

Can I join a PRO even if I am not a citizen in the country the PRO is located?

For the most part, you are able to join any PRO regardless of nationality. PROs have agreements with other organization to collect royalties, however pay schedules may vary based on those agreements. Alternatively, you can also register with groups like Songtrust to administor your royalty collection. 

Which PRO should I join?

We recommend starting with a PRO in your country. This will be a good starting point to see what they offer.

Is there a list of PROs based on country?

Yes! You can view our List of Performing Rights Organizations for quick reference, or you can find a more detailed list on CISACs website.

Where do I start?

Start by finding a PRO that you think will best represent you and your goals. See what benefits they offer, and check out their website for further instructions to register. It’s a good idea to register so that you can collect all potential revenue streams for your music!

List of Performing Rights Organizations

Performing Rights Organization (PRO) serve as an intermediary to collect royalties for when your music is performed live (either digitally or by a live band/performing group). If you want to collect these royalties then you will need to register for one of these organizations.

Artists looking to join a PRO should register with one of the organizations below. This list may not reflect every country or active PRO, and is intended to provide a quick reference for the most common organizations. CISAC (France) serves as the governing body for PROs and has additional information and a full member directory here.

To learn more about PROs, check out our Frequently Asked Questions about Performing Rights Organizations.

ArgentinaSADAIC
AustraliaAustralasian Performing Right Association (APRA)
AustraliaPhonographic Performance Company of Australia (PPCA)
AustriaAutoren, Komponisten und Musikverleger (AKM)
BelgiumSABAM
BoliviaServicio Nacional de Propiedad Intellectual (SENAPI)
BrazilECAD (Escritório Central de Arrecadação e Distribuição)
BulgariaMUSICAUTOR
CanadaSociety of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada (SOCAN)
ChileSociedad Chilena del Derecho de Autor (SCD)
ChinaMusic Copyright Society of China(MCSC)
ColombiaSAYCO/ACINPRO
CroatiaHDS
Czech RepublicOSA
DenmarkKODA
EstoniaEAU
FinlandTeosto
FranceSociété des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs de musique (SACEM)
GeorgiaSAS
GermanyGesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte (GEMA)
GreeceAEPI
GreeceGEA-GRAMMO, ERATO-APOLLON
Hong KongCASH
HungaryARTISJUS
IndiaThe Indian Performing Right Society Ltd
IrelandIrish Music Rights Organisation, Phonographic Performance Ireland (PPI)
IsraelACUM
ItalySIAE
JapanJASRAC
LithuaniaLATGA-A
MalaysiaMACP
MexicoSACM
NepalMusic Royalty Collection Society Nepal (MRCSN)
NetherlandsBUMA
New ZealandAPRA
NorwayTONO
PanamaSPAC
PeruAPDAYC
PhilippinesFILSCAP
PolandZAIKS
Puerto RicoACEMLA
RomaniaUCMR
RussiaRAO
SerbiaSOKOJ
SingaporeComposers and Authors Society of Singapore Ltd (COMPASS)
SlovakiaSOZA
South AfricaSouthern African Music Rights Organisation (SAMRO)
South KoreaKOMCA, KOSCAP
SpainSGAE
SwedenSTIM
SwitzerlandSUISA
TaiwanMÜST
ThailandMCT
Trinidad and TobagoCOTT
UkraineUACRR
United KingdomPRS, PPL
United States of AmericaASCAP, BMI, SESAC, ACEMLA (SPACEM), AllTrack, Global Music Rights (GMR), Pro Music Rights
UruguayAGADU
VenezuelaSACVEN

Did we leave any off the list? Let us know!